Noncrystalloid vs Crystalloid IV Fluid
Studies Survival to Hospital Discharge Need for Other Treatment Need for Rescue Fluid Mechanical Ventilation or Vasopressor Time to Resolution of Shock Total IV Fluids Hospital Duration of Stay
Severe sepsis/ septic shock Upadhyay 2005 No Benefit No Benefit No Studies Available No Benefit No Benefit No Studies Available No Studies Available
Severe malaria Maitland 2003; Maitland 2005 No Studies Available No Benefit No Studies Available No Studies Available No Benefit No Studies Available No Studies Available
Dengue shock Cifra 2003; Dung 1999; Ngo 2001; Wills 2005 No Benefit No Benefit No Benefit No Studies Available Benefit No Benefit No Benefit
Severe febrile illness with some but not all signs of shock Maitland 2011 No Benefit No Benefit No Benefit No Studies Available No Benefit No Benefit No Studies Available
Evidence for the use of noncrystalloid intravenous fluid resuscitation, compared with crystalloid, by presenting illness and outcome. Benefit indicates that studies show a benefit to the use of noncrystalloid intravenous fluid resuscitation compared with crystalloid, and No Benefit indicates that there is no benefit to the use of noncrystalloid intravenous fluid resuscitation compared with crystalloid. No Studies Available indicates no studies are available for a particular illness/outcome combination.